Twin Birth Study results published
Delivering twins by planned vaginal birth is just as safe as delivering them by planned cesarean section, according to newly published findings of the Twin Birth Study in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). This was a multi-site trial led by Sunnybrook.
"Our findings show that planned vaginal birth is the correct method for delivering twins in a pregnancy that is otherwise uncomplicated, and when the first baby is facing head down," says Dr. Jon Barrett, Chief, Maternal-Fetal Medicine at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Director, Women & Babies Research Program at Sunnybrook Research Institute.
"We found that there is no reason for doctors or women to be planning to deliver twins by cesarean section, as the babies' outcomes remain the same regardless of how they are delivered," adds Dr. Barrett.
The findings of the study, which involved 106 centres in 25 countries, appear in the October 3 publication of the NEJM. Nearly a decade in the making, it is the only large scale, randomized controlled trial that has been undertaken to determine the optimal method of delivering twins.
"People are often not sure what the right delivery method is, and sometimes default to cesarean section because they perceive it to be safer. However, we now know that is not the case," says Dr. Barrett, who is also Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto and the principle investigator of the study.
Dr. Barrett and his colleagues hope the findings of the Twin Birth Study will help decrease the rate of unnecessarycesarean sections. "I think these results will serve as a ‘heads up' to physicians to keep vaginal delivery skills in practice, so we don't lose them," says Dr. Barrett.
The Twin Birth Study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).